For law firms and in-house legal teams
Your firm's legal method. Consistent in every matter.
Define which statutes, case law, review questions, and legal authorities should apply. Decide how memos, motions, and other filings should be structured and worded. LexActa then applies your firm's chosen method to new case records and delivers a consistent work product with the same structure, tone, and level of rigor every time. The attorney always reviews the output and remains responsible for the final judgment call.
Your method, built into the tool
The firm defines its authorities, review questions, document templates, and quality standards once. LexActa applies the same method consistently on every new matter.
- Your own legal authorities
- Your own review questions
- Your own templates and document structures
- Your own tone and level of detail
- Consistent source tracing
- Reusable workflows
- The same quality bar in every matter
Not an open AI chat
Each reviewer follows a predefined workflow for the relevant practice area. Your firm doesn't need to write its own prompts or start from scratch on every matter.
General-purpose AI
- • Requires the user to write their own instructions
- • Results vary between users and sessions
- • Often lacks a fixed legal workflow
- • The firm's method has to be re-explained each time
LexActa
- • Fixed, quality-assured review steps
- • Practice-area-specific workflows
- • The firm's method is defined once and reused
- • The attorney keeps control of the judgment
Practice-area-specific reviewers
LexActa is made up of separate reviewers, each with its own review points, legal authorities, and report structure. A reviewer for a new practice area can be configured in about 20 minutes based on your firm's method — for example, a New Hampshire child protection matter under RSA 169-C in Circuit Court – Family Division, or a criminal defense filing.
From individual expertise to a shared firm method
An experienced attorney's method can be used by the whole team — while every result is still reviewed and judged by the responsible attorney.
More consistent quality
The firm's best working method is applied consistently, no matter who does the initial work.
Less key-person dependency
Method, review questions, and document standards persist even when staff move on.
More time for judgment
The tool handles the groundwork — the attorney gets more time for legal judgment and client work.
Examples from the tool
An anonymized sample report and product screenshots will be added before public launch.
Book a demo
We'll show you how the tool reviews a record from your practice area, and how your firm's method can be built in. We respond inom ett par timmar.